Archive for February, 2013

Police agencies in the United States to begin using drones in 90 days

Posted in Politics on February 27, 2013 by betweentwopines

 

By Watertown Daily Times

 

Image by Gary Friedman / Los Angeles Times

Coming soon to the skies above you — drones, drones and more drones.

And all giving police and who knows who else the chance to peek into your backyard.

Legislation just signed by President Obama directs the Federal Aviation Administration to open the skies to remotely controlled drones within the next three years. It will begin in 90 days with police and first responders having authority to fly smaller drones of less than 4.4 pounds at altitudes under 400 feet. Gradually, all drones are to be allowed by Sept. 30, 2015.

The use of drones had been restricted out of civilian aviation safety concerns created by a sky full of drones flown by untrained operators in the same space as aircraft. But that was overridden by successful lobbying of drone makers and customers who will reap the financial benefits for commercial purposes. “The market for drones is valued at $5.9 billion and is expected to double in the next decade,” the New York Times reported.

They can be used by real estate agents to snap aerial photos. But then, given costs and ease of use, what will stop a member of the paparazzi or any other prying photographer from using them to get more personal snapshots? The Times report said a $300 drone can be flown from an iPhone.

The planned expansion extends the militarization of law enforcement that has been going with the adaptation of military technology and strategies to civilian law enforcement. Police see several advantages to drones over other surveillance.

The pilotless craft cost less, are cheaper to operate and can remain airborne longer. They can be used as a crimefighting tool to patrol from the skies. Authorities can monitor traffic, search remote areas for missing persons or watch criminal suspects. But, then, police can watch a political rally, silently from 30,000 feet overhead.

But also alarming is the danger of escalating their use to include weapons. Drone builders are researching the use of nonlethal weapons such as tear gas, tasers and stun guns fired from a drone, and lethal weaponry can be an easy next step on the slippery slope.

The drones will add to the erosion of privacy that has come with the ubiquitous cameras and global positioning systems that can monitor our whereabouts.

The new law is concerned with safety in establishing guidelines and training requirements for operators. It will be up to governments and even the courts to enact constitutional safeguards on their use.

Source  http://dgrnewsservice.org/2012/02/26/police-agencies-in-the-united-states-to-begin-using-drones-in-90-days/

 

From Watertown Daily Times:http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20120226/OPINION01/702269975/1036/opinion

For another source, see the New York Times, “Drones With an Eye on the Public Cleared to Fly

What do fruits and vegetables look like inside an MRI? Short answer: “Whoa.”

Posted in Science on February 27, 2013 by betweentwopines

.  Andy Ellison of Boston University Medical School has been throwing the entire produce aisle inside a Philips 3 Tesla MRI, revealing the otherworldly realms that dwell inside common foods. Here’s but a small sampling of his many see-through delicacies, immortalized as GIFs…
LINK

Sunflower

 

 

Tomato

 

More….http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/4oYmLP/:As6PG9nL:ThFaQn-t/io9.com/5949058/what-do-fruits-and-vegetables-look-like-inside-an-mri-short-answer-whoa/

DOJ Memo: Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns

Posted in Politics on February 25, 2013 by betweentwopines

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
February 24, 2013

DOJ memo states: “Buybacks are ineffective unless massive and coupled with a ban.”

The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo calling for national gun registration and confiscation. The nine page “cursory summary” on current gun control initiatives was not officially released by the Obama administration.

The DOJ memo (downloadable here as a PDF) states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.

The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration’s public stance on so-called gun control. White House spokesman Jay Carney said last month that laws proposed by Obama would not “take away a gun from a single law-abiding American.”

The NRA declined to explain how it obtained the document. The memo was written by the acting director of the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice, Greg Ridgeway. It is dated January 4, two weeks before Obama mounted his attack on the Second Amendment following the Sandy Hook massacre. Ridgeway came to the Justice Department from the RAND corporation.

The memo says universal background checks on firearms purchases may help the government push to control and eventually outlaw firearms, but it would lead to an increase in illegally purchased guns.

It pointed out that banning high capacity ammunition clips would be ineffective due to the fact there is a large number of them already in circulation.

Justice Department official said the memo is an unfinished review of gun violence research and does not represent administration policy.

The DOJ memo arrived a few weeks prior to a letter sent out by the Department of Veterans Affairs. “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition,” the sent to military veterans states. “If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”

“US veterans are receiving letters from the government informing them that they are disabled and not allowed to own, purchase or possess a firearm. If the veteran does decide to purchase a firearm he will by fined, imprisoned or both,” the Gateway Pundit remarked.

More  http://www.infowars.com/doj-memo-outlaw-and-confiscate-all-guns/

ATS Thread  http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread929108/pg1

Secret

Posted in Finance on February 25, 2013 by betweentwopines

Topic started on 25-2-2013 @ 09:31 AM by piequal3because14

“Secret is the destructive force of hidden knowledge that keeps the World in poverty.”

bakkenmama.areavoices.com…

Printing money is an easy job for the Federal Reserve but keeping them under control is a hard task.I mean keeping them from not dissapear in night shadows.

Let’s assume that deposited fresh printed cash in an unexplainable way dissapears over night from where is deposited before being thrown on the market.

I know what you will say that the majority of the tranzactions are made electronically therefore is no need for cash.

You can thank the reckless money printing that the Federal Reserve has been doing for the incredible bull market that we have seen in recent months. When the Federal Reserve does more “quantitative easing”, it is the financial markets that benefit the most. The Dow and the S&P 500 have both hit levels not seen since 2007 this month, and many analysts are projecting that 2013 will be a banner year for stocks. But is a rising stock market really a sign that the overall economy is rapidly improving as many are suggesting? Of course not. Just because the Federal Reserve has inflated another false stock market bubble with a bunch of funny money does not mean that the U.S. economy is in great shape. In fact, the truth is that things just keep getting worse for average Americans. The percentage of working age Americans with a job has fallen from 60.6% to 58.6% while Barack Obama has been president, 40 percent of all American workers are making $20,000 a year or less, median household income has declined for four years in a row, and poverty in the United States is absolutely exploding. So quantitative easing has definitely not made things better for the middle class. But all of the money printing that the Fed has been doing has worked out wonderfully for Wall Street. Profits are soaring at Goldman Sachs and luxury estates in the Hamptons are selling briskly. Unfortunately, this is how things work in America these days. Our “leaders” seem far more concerned with the welfare of Wall Street than they do about the welfare of the American people. When things get rocky, their first priority always seems to be to do whatever it takes to pump up the financial markets.

theeconomiccollapseblog.com…

but the truth is that even under surveilance camera the cash dissapears over night like vanishing and forces that are beyond power of understanding are doing this.

Like a big conspiracy that someone or…something is doing and for which there is no explanation because this phenomena is happening all over the world.

The Destruction of Money: Who Does It, Why, When, and How?Think about money being created. A furiously spinning printing press might come to mind. Now imagine money being destroyed. Do you think of a three-story shredder, a bonfire, a wide blue recycling bin?

You might have noticed that it’s pretty hard to find any cash printed much earlier than the 1990s in circulation. Just as more money is constantly being created, it’s also constantly being destroyed. Who are the destroyers of money, and how do they do it?

In order to explain money destruction, we have to define what we mean by money destruction. For example, are we talking about money being eliminated, its very presence disappearing from the economy? Or are we talking about when money is physically destroyed but replaced with newer, crisper currency? Let’s consider both questions.

www.theatlantic.com…

Billions Lost in Secret Federal Reserve Funding of Iraq War Tens of billions were shipped to Iraq since the 2003 invasion, most of it lost or stolen. And we’re not allowed to know about it.Since the beginning of the Iraq War in 2003, the New York Federal Reserve has been shipping tens of billions of dollars to the government and central bank of Iraq, ostensibly for reconstruction and resumption of governmental services after the fall of Saddam Hussein. Between 2003 and 2008, over $40 billion in cash was secretly shipped in trucks from the New York Federal Reserve compound in East Rutherford, New Jersey to Andrews Air Force Base outside of Washington, where they were then flown by military aircraft to Baghdad International Airport. In just the first two years, the shipments of dollar bills weighed a total of 363 tons.

news.antiwar.com…

And is very well kept secret.

To print money it’s an easy job but to secure them against unknown and uncontrollable forces is almost impossible when you have no control of why they dissapear so fast.

Oh you might say that external hostile organizations could do this but sorry no..because this will mean this phenomena to be related to only one country.

This is a situation with which all the governments of the world are confronting and they are looking for an answer that may never come.

Because some decisions were taken’ and when “beyond understanding” is taking decisions nothing and nobody can stop for what’s to come.

You could say that the economics are to blame for this situation but in fact the real cause is a very well kept secret which probably will never be revealed.

As fast as the Bank is printing money, it’s disappearing down a pension black hole It is time that rules governing pension liabilities were put on a sane basis, rather than the insane calculations employers are currently forced to observe.The scale of the problem was highlighted on Wednesday by Smiths Group. It paid at least £122m last year to fund a pension deficit that has artificially ballooned as an unforeseen consequence of the Bank of England’s quantitative easing programme to print money and keep borrowing costs low.
Rules on pension deficits were not designed with QE in mind and are no longer fit for purpose. They are damaging the economy.
As fast as the Bank creates more cash through QE, chunks of it are being recycled straight into accounting black holes, which means billions are not being invested to create jobs or pay dividends. And it’s not at all clear whether pension trustees actually want the cash. Their regulator restricts them from reinvesting it usefully in the stockmarket, buying yet more gilts is a one-way guaranteed bet to lose capital, and cash in the bank doesn’t earn anything and is hardly being put to work by lenders.
I won’t bore you with the inner workings of the problem, but basically the rules state deficits have to be measured at a single point in time using the current return on gilts to calculate the future liabilities as if they all fell due today.

www.telegraph.co.uk…
You could find a thousand reasons but the real reason is the one described Above.

Or maybe not to let your eyes caught like here….

www.abovetopsecret.com…

Thread of above post   http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread929310/pg1

New anti-piracy system will hit U.S. Internet users next week

Posted in Technology on February 25, 2013 by betweentwopines

By Kevin Collier on February 22, 2013

 

Starting next week, most U.S. Internet users will be subject to a new copyright enforcement system that could slow the Internet to a crawl and force violators to take educational courses.

A source with direct knowledge of the Copyright Alert System (CAS), who asked not to be named, has told the Daily Dot that the five participating Internet service providers (ISPs) will start the controversial program Monday.

The ISPs—industry giants AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner, and Verizon—will launch their versions of the CAS on different days throughout the week. Comcast is expected to be the first, on Monday.

The CAS, designed as an “educational” service to combat casual piracy in the U.S., has been criticized as designed purely for corporate interests, at the expense of the average Internet user. While it doesn’t require ISPs to cut off Internet access to repeat pirates—as is the case in France and New Zealand—it will issue escalating punishments to suspected pirates, severely reducing their connection speeds after five or six offenses.

Though the system’s executive director promised to hire an independent consultant to vet the software that will flag copyright violators, that hasn’t happened yet.

The date of the launch isn’t yet official—the source expressed surprise that the news has been kept so tightly under wraps—but it’s been rumored for several weeks to be at the end of February.

Apparently to mark the launch, the CAS has created a shinynew website. It replaces a drab earlier version, one that would go months without an update and seemed a metaphor for the the system’s repeated delays and internal conflicts: Most recently, it was pushed from November to late February, “due to unexpected factors largely stemming from Hurricane Sandy.”

The CAS also has a sleek new promotional video, wherein a woman explains the process over smooth jazz

 

Source   http://www.dailydot.com/news/copyright-alerts-system-launch-six-strikes/

ATS   Thread    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread929041/pg1

RELATED STORIES

Your guide to life under the Copyright Alerts System

3 unintended effects of the Copyright Alerts System

100 Million Years Old Giant Skull And Teeth Found Embedded In Coal

Posted in Science on February 25, 2013 by betweentwopines

TRUTHER FEBRUARY 25, 2013

There is no controversy about these facts; there was a race or group of people found in Australia called “meganthropus” by anthropologists. These people were of very large size–estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read.

These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of “gigantopithecus blacki”–named after thediscover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds. (Photo:Giant human femur reportedly found in Turkey)

The “problem” is that human fossils are the rarest of all, and generally, only the hardest bones, jaws, teeth and skulls survive. As with most “early man” artistic recreations, a great deal of the individual is surmised.

The question is, is gigantopithecus a man or an ape? I personally have no opinion, but it is clear that very large men did live once. Scientists are of course afraid of being ridiculed and rather than estimate the size of the individuals possessing larger skulls and teeth than “us”, they prefer to use the term robust.

Anthropologists spend quite a bit of time trying to decide what is an ape, what is a man, who they believe descended from who and the like. Now, most consider gigantopithecus an ape,(its more convenient to the theory of evol) but the co-discover at least, and many others still see no difference between the teeth and jaws of Giganto than other so-called ancestors.

As we said, everyone believes that meganthropus with his mega-tools was a “man”. Tools have been found in the same area as giganto as well, but the tendency has been to associate them with other “types’ found at the same location.

Source  http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/02/25/100-million-years-old-giant-skull-and-teeth-found-embedded-in-coal/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm

Aspartame in Milk Without a Label? Big Dairy Petitions FDA For Approval

Posted in Health on February 25, 2013 by betweentwopines

Two powerful dairy organizations, The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), are petitioning the Food and Drug Administration to allow aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to be added to milk and other dairy products without a label.

The FDA currently allows the dairy industry to use “nutritive sweeteners” including sugar and high fructose corn syrup in many of their products. Nutritive sweeteners are defined as sweeteners with calories.

This petition officially seeks to amend the standard of identification for milk, cream, and 17 other dairy products like yogurt, sweetened condensed milk, sour cream, and others to provide for the use of any “safe and suitable sweetener” on the market.

They claim that aspartame and other artificial sweeteners would promote healthy eating and is good for school children.

According to the FDA notice issued this week:

IDFA and NMPF state that the proposed amendments would promote more healthful eating practices and reduce childhood obesity by providing for lower-calorie flavored milk products. They state that lower-calorie flavored milk would particularly benefit school children who, according to IDFA and NMPF, are more inclined to drink flavored milk than unflavored milk at school.

Although the FDA considers aspartame to be a “safe and suitable” sweetener, a recent Yale University study appears to directly challenge the claim that aspartame would reduce obesity. In fact, the study concluded just the opposite, that artificial sweeteners actually contributed to obesity and Type 2 diabetes.

The IDFA and NMPF argue “that the proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity would promote honesty and fair dealing in the marketplace” yet they don’t want changes to the labels on dairy products.

Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further claims so that consumers can “more easily identify its overall nutritional value.”

It’s unclear how consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners without labels.

Quoting Section 130.10 of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, the dairy giants claim a new label is not required because sugar is added to milk without labeling it, and “the modified food is not inferior in performance” and “‘reduced calorie’ (labels) are not attractive to children” so marketing as such is of no benefit or detriment.

The FDA has opened public comments until May 21 for anyone interested to “submit comments, data, and information concerning the need for, and the appropriateness of, amending the standard of identity for milk and the additional dairy standards.”

Source   http://usahitman.com/aimwlbdp/

ATS thread  http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread929133/pg1

Proven Unsafe But FDA-Approved: Are YOU Still Consuming This Man-Made Poison?

August 03, 2011

Americans drink more soda than anyone else on the planet — well over 700 eight-ounce servings each year, on average, and an increasing amount of it is diet soda.

They might be more reluctant to do so if they knew about the safety questions still surrounding aspartame. A number of scientists responding expressed major concerns about aspartame’s safety at the time of its approval, and even more indicated areas where they believed more research is needed on aspartame to resolve their concerns — research on areas such as neurological functions, brain tumors, seizures, headaches, and adverse effects on children and pregnant women.

Grist reports:

“In a 1996 survey, Ralph G. Walton … looked at 166 peer-reviewed studies on aspartame undertaken between 1980 and 1985. He found that all 74 of the studies funded by the industry found no adverse effects from aspartame, while 84 of the 92 independently funded articles did find bad effects.”

Aspartame is the ingredient found in NutraSweet, It is also found in Equal, Spoonful, Equal Measure, AminoSweet, Benevia, NutraTaste, Canderel, and many popular “diet” sodas. This chemical is currently on the ingredient list of nearly 6,000 products worldwide. But since it was approved for use as a food additive in 1981, it has been dogged by complaints about its safety.

Was aspartame ever proven safe for human consumption before it gained FDA approval as a food additive?

Not according to Dr. John Olney, a researcher at Washington University in Saint Louis who first began studying aspartame in 1970. Dr. Olhney believes aspartame should not be on the market today “because it hasn’t been demonstrated to be safe.” Also in agreement with Dr. Olney are the FDA’s own investigations into the chemical from 1975 to 1980.

When the FDA was presented with Dr. Olney’s research, they assigned an outside public board of inquiry the task of deciding if aspartame should be allowed for human consumption. In 1980, the doctors on that board unanimously ruled that aspartame should not go on the market. An internal FDA panel concluded the same thing in 1980.

According to the FDA Chairman at that time, Dr. Gere Goyan, his next recommendation was to set up another FDA committee to study aspartame, composed people who played no previous part in the former studies of aspartame. Dr. Gere Goyan never saw the results of that 1980 FDA internal study, because he was forced to step down as FDA Chairman the day Ronald Reagan took office on January 21, 1981.

His replacement? Dr. Arthur Hill Hayes.

Dr. Hayes is notable for two reasons. First, he had no previous history of dealing with the science of food additives. Second, he was apparently hand picked to head the FDA by a prominent member of Ronald Reagan’s political transition team, Donald Rumsfeld. Yes, the same Donald Rumsfeld who led the United States into the multi trillion dollar wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as Secretary of Defense during the Bush presidency. But in 1981, Rumsfeld had a different title: CEO of the G.D Searle company, the company that owned the patent on aspartame.

One of Dr. Arthur Hill Hayes first acts as FDA Chairman was granting aspartame approval for use in dry goods. Incidentally, one of Hayes’ last acts in office as FDA Chairman was to approve aspartame for use in beverages.

So was aspartame approved because studies ever showed it was safe for human consumption? Or was it approved thanks to the political influence of Donald Rumsfeld?

According to former Sentator Howard Metzenbaum, who reviewed the FDA’s approval process of aspartame in the Senate in 1987, “I think there were a lot of politics involved in its being approved.” Research scientist Dr. Olney is even more blunt, “the issue (aspartame) is really not an issue of science, it’s an issue of politics.”

Source  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/03/just-how-bad-is-aspartame.aspx